A discussion on the right punishment for hate crimes

Matt Sunday, 4 May

A discussion on the right punishment for hate crimes

To be clear, the First Amendment does not protect behavior that crosses the line into targeted harassment or threats, or that creates a pervasively hostile environment. But merely offensive or bigoted speech does not rise to that level, and determining when conduct crosses that line is a legal question that requires examination on a case-by-case basis.

Generally, however, hate speech is any form of expression through which speakers intend to vilify, humiliate, or incite hatred against a group or a class of persons. Free Speech and the Development of Liberal Virtues: This is based upon the belief that freedom of speech requires the government to strictly protect robust debate on matters of public concern even when such debate devolves into distasteful, offensive, or hateful speech that causes others to feel grief, anger, or fear.

Under current First Amendment jurisprudence, hate speech can only be criminalized when it directly incites imminent criminal activity or consists of specific threats of violence targeted against a person or group. The court ruled in Brandenburg v. Itthe the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a teenager convicted of burning a cross on the lawn of an African American family's home R.

Inthe Supreme Court set aside a civil judgment that punished a church group, the Westboro Baptist Church, for picketing a military funeral with signs displaying messages disparaging the dead officer, LGBTQ persons, and the U.

All stories

Tolerance of hate speech not only protects and upholds everyone's right to express outrageous, unorthodox or unpopular speech; it also allows society and the targets of hate speech to know about and respond to racist or hateful speech and protect against its harms.

Hate Crime Hate itself is not a crime. The Supreme Court has upheld laws that either criminalize these acts or impose a harsher punishment when it can be proven that the defendant targeted the victim because of the victim's race, ethnicity, identity, or beliefs.

For Libraries Libraries are sanctuary spaces for First Amendment ideals. Symbols of hate are also constitutionally protected if worn or displayed in a public place. Libraries should comply with the ideals and legal requirements of the First Amendment.

We make room for offensive, bigoted, and biased speech in the libraries if that speech is simply that: We cannot limit speech on the basis of its content alone, but we can address inappropriate or illegal behavior. A hate crime, however, is about more than speech or conduct.

It is about specific criminal behavior. Defacement or vandalization of library property in a way that includes language or symbols that target specific groups.

This would include racial epithets or swastikas, for instance, as we have seen in Kansas CityMo. Here the behavior is meant to physically injure, or threaten to injure, people because of their membership in a specific group typically religious, racial, cultural, sexual, or disability. If someone touches, strikes, or might reasonably be construed as getting ready to physically intimidate someone else because that person is a member of a diverse group, that is a hate crime.

To that end, libraries and library workers should embrace equity, diversity, and inclusion in everything that they do.

However, if library staff have encountered hate speech that may not be defined as a crime, we acknowledge that the impact can be traumatizing.of the despicable nature of hate crimes.

The other side has advocated for abandoning hate crime laws, arguing that such laws incorrectly this Note asserts that hate crime punishment must be just, only punishing criminals in proportion to the harm that and federal hate crime legislation is presented.

Finally, a discussion of the causes. This little work is written for the purpose of furnishing a sketch of the argument by which it is shown that the doctrine of Endless Punishment is not of divine origin, but traceable directly to a heathen source. It is not intended as an elaborately philosophical or critical discussion of the.

Footer Links

Why do I hate cops? Easy. They roll heavier than we did outside the wire downrange, they use helicopters and machine guns and militarized stuff and drive tanks into crowds, they systemically kill innocent people across the country. Debra Brown Sprindale, OH.

My question is based on my belief that though things are better in the US between the races (by ‘races’ I mean Blacks and whites, specifically); there is an underlying animosity from white people, as a group, against Black people, as a group, that persists.

Jun 24,  · Hate crimes occur because of the perpetrator’s prejudice or animosity against the victim on the basis of status and the victim’s personal characteristic—the victim’s race, religion, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability is the reason for the crime.

Defining a Hate Crime.

A discussion on the right punishment for hate crimes

A hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. For the purposes of collecting statistics, the FBI has defined a hate.

Eric Cartman | South Park Archives | FANDOM powered by Wikia